How does bringing up Metro 2033 support your argument that this is a poop console port? It looks and runs way better than the console versions and it's cheaper. the 360 version is the port of said: said: Just leave this thread until you've played the game and stop making yourself look like an idiot. It's far better than what you get with the console version and there's no reason not to pick it up for PC. Just leave this thread until you've played the game and stop making yourself look like an said: I'm running it on ultra with MSAA off and it runs just fine and I don't have an amazing video card (560 ti). The game looks and runs amazing if you turn off MSAA and I'm sure can look even better if your gpu can handle it.
Just cause things have had the PC in mind doesn't automatically stop them from being poor.Īgain you're making uninformed garbage posts and you clearly haven't played it. Metro 2033 has a fuck tonne of graphical options yet it's still unoptimised as fuck, doesn't matter that it's a straight up PC game, it's still unoptimised.
Just cause things have had the PC in mind doesn't automatically stop them from being said:Ī game that doesn't look much better than most other PC games yet runs SO much worse? That's a bad port.
Would it have been a better port if they had just turned off all the graphical option and made them unavailable to the user so the framerate doesn't take a hit?Ī game that doesn't look much better than most other PC games yet runs SO much worse? That's a bad port. That's what shows they have the PC crowd in mind because you can tinker until you find your own personal sweet spot.
How is a game that looks phenomenally better than the console counterparts a poop console port? They give you every graphical option you could ask for. I love uninformed garbage posts like these. Hopefully it'll get patched, but I guess we can add it to the leagues of poop console ports. Yeah according to the PCGamer review it runs like ass.